{"id":3772,"date":"2024-04-24T18:33:59","date_gmt":"2024-04-24T18:33:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trevorgreenwood.co.uk\/tg\/?page_id=3772"},"modified":"2024-04-28T16:14:58","modified_gmt":"2024-04-28T16:14:58","slug":"letter-15-11-45","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/trevorgreenwood.co.uk\/tg\/november-1945\/letter-15-11-45\/","title":{"rendered":"Letter 15.11.45"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>No. 7925934. Sgt. Greenwood.<br \/>\nC Sqdn, 9th Battn R.T.R.<br \/>\nB.A.O.R.<\/p>\n<p>15.11.45<\/p>\n<p>Thursday<br \/>\nD -15<\/p>\n<p>Jessie Mine: There was no &#8216;D -16&#8217; in this &#8216;last series&#8217; of my letters: I didn&#8217;t write yesterday &#8211; because of a little function we had in the mess. The major came round with two other officers &#8211; and as they remained until about 1.0am, there was no time for anything but bed.<\/p>\n<p>The function was a farewell dinner &#8211; for the 21 and 22 group sergeants &#8211; i.e. Sgt Dodwell, Sgt Challinor, Sgt Hamnett, and myself.  There was nothing special about it&#8230; just a dinner followed by the usual reminiscing and yarns &#8211; and speculation about the future.  The officers joined us after dinner &#8211; and stayed rather later than we expected. I suppose we can regard this as another of the numerous stages towards demobilisation&#8230; and freedom&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Today, I have passed through a further stage &#8211; involving a kit check, and the handing-in of certain items of equipment and clothing. Amongst other things, I parted with one of my battle dress suits, a pair of boots and a gas-cape, so my kit is now less bulky &#8211; and lighter: I&#8217;m all in favour of this kit dumping business:- I wish they&#8217;d take the lot off me.  But I mustn&#8217;t be in too big a hurry &#8211; I will shed most of my remaining items when I reach England.<\/p>\n<p>There was a lovely long letter for me yesterday, Jess &#8211; a very nice prelude to the dinner-!  I liked your account of Barry&#8217;s behaviour during his visit to your Auntie&#8217;s.  He certainly seems to have captivated Tom Pickford &#8211; a rather remarkable achievement.  And his &#8216;Joey&#8217; performance-! That <b>was<\/b> news my dear. But why doesn&#8217;t he do the same at home? He obviously knows the purpose of &#8216;Joey&#8217;. Perhaps you have solved the mystery by now&#8230; and said good-bye to napkin-washing. How much easier your life will be if this is so!<\/p>\n<p>Thanks for your account of Dorothy&#8217;s visit <i>(RTG&#8217;s older sister)<\/i>: she had already told me about K&#8217;s visit <i>(Kathleen, RTG&#8217;s younger sister)<\/i>&#8230; but there were some more details in your letter. (&#8230;)  <\/p>\n<p>And now, what can I tell you about myself? I have done very little work today: my &#8216;department&#8217; is now organised, and running quite smoothly. Also, I have a corporal and lance corporal as assistants, and am now leaving the job increasingly in their hands &#8211; retiring gracefully, as it were, because it will be entirely their job in a couple of weeks&#8217; time. I suppose they will become sergeant and corporal respectively when I have departed.<\/p>\n<p>This evening, I have heard a few more interesting items over the radio &#8211; including Stravinsky&#8217;s &#8216;Fire-Bird&#8217; Suite, and Brahms&#8217; First Symphony&#8230; <b>the<\/b> symphony &#8211; which you and I once discovered: this evening&#8217;s performance brought that lovely experience home to me very vividly. It was the B.B.C. Scottish Orchestra I heard: <b>they do<\/b> play some grand music, darling. I know I have told you this before but it will stand repeating. <\/p>\n<p>Another interesting item was tonight&#8217;s B.B.C. news &#8211; In addition to revealing new government legislation, there was the statement on atomic energy by Truman, Attlee and Mackenzie-King. It sounded a most statesmanlike pronouncement, but the phrasing made it rather difficult to remember many of the details, and I am looking forward to the press announcements to study it more leisurely.  I got the impression that there is still evidence of &#8216;suspicion&#8217; about Russia in the document &#8211; but I may be wrong.  In any case, Russia ought to be the last to complain about &#8216;suspicion&#8217; just now.<\/p>\n<p>It was good to hear about the proposed improvements in the standard of &#8216;Council Houses&#8217;: I gather that they are going to be more &#8216;roomy&#8217; in future&#8230; and include lavatories both upstairs and downstairs.  It is grand to hear of these proposals, Jess. I know it is not world-shattering news, but there have been a number of similar small news items lately and they give the impression that our affairs are now being directed by people with a little vision and some appreciation of the former squalor of working-class homes. It is no doubt true that we have a right to expect these improvements from a Socialist Government&#8230; but after so many years of governmental deception and political trickery, I think I had become slightly cynical and more or less prepared for a continuation of the old game&#8230; with perhaps a few half-hearted attempts by the socialists to implement their promises.<\/p>\n<p>But my pessimism is being confounded, and I feel very happy about it. Similarly, my opinion of Attlee was wrong. He seems to have picked a fine team for his government, and is proving a lion in sheep&#8217;s clothing, so far as the Tories are concerned.  It is rather interesting to compare his speeches with those of Churchill.  They don&#8217;t tingle one&#8217;s blood or arouse one&#8217;s patriotic fervour, but how fresh and clean they seem to be.  As a physical background to Churchill&#8217;s pronouncements, I can imagine a deeply carpeted room, overflowing with opulence and reeking of cigars and well-being, and with walls adorned with the usual evidence of wealth &#8211; the hunting trophies and stuffed animal-heads of the &#8216;pukka-sahib&#8217;. But with Attlee, I visualise a light airy room, bathed in sunlight and equipped with chromium furniture and flowers:- lots of colour &#8211; but no ostentation. I suppose this is a psychological picture &#8211; maybe a bit wishful thinking &#8211; but it is my own reaction to Churchill&#8217;s habit of appealing to one&#8217;s heart &#8211; and Attlee&#8217;s of appealing to one&#8217;s head.<\/p>\n<p>Jess &#8211; I want you to pay attention to this: it&#8217;s important.  I have just been listening to a breathtaking piece of music: it was part of a piano concert &#8211; (I believe). It was so good that I had to stop writing to you to listen to it. When it was over, the announcer said something in a foreign lingo, but I know he said the music was by Cesar Franck &#8211; and something about &#8216;Sinfony&#8217;. I couldn&#8217;t get any more of the announcement, but we have at least a clue &#8211; and I mean to follow it up soon. Will you make a note of this, darling: it is not convenient for me to keep notes here: Likewise, don&#8217;t forget the two pieces I mentioned earlier &#8211; i.e. Tchaikovsky&#8217;s March Slav (op 31?) &#8211; and Clive Richardson&#8217;s &#8220;London Fantasia&#8221;. We <b>might<\/b> be able to afford a few gramophone records when I become a civvy.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s all for tonight, my love&#8230;<br \/>\nNot many more lonely good-nights &#8211;<br \/>\nAu revoir &#8211; my sweet heart<br \/>\nAlways &#8211; Your Trevy<\/p>\n<div class=\"center\">\n<ul class=\"pagination\">\n<li><a class=\"active\" href=\"https:\/\/trevorgreenwood.co.uk\/tg\/november-1945\/letter-13-11-45\/\">\u276e Previous letter<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"active\" href=\"https:\/\/trevorgreenwood.co.uk\/tg\/november-1945\/letter-16-11-45\/\">Next letter \u276f<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>No. 7925934. Sgt. Greenwood. C Sqdn, 9th Battn R.T.R. B.A.O.R. 15.11.45 Thursday D -15 Jessie Mine: There was no &#8216;D -16&#8217; in this &#8216;last series&#8217; of my letters: I didn&#8217;t write yesterday &#8211; because of a little function we had <span class=\"excerpt-dots\">&hellip;<\/span> <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/trevorgreenwood.co.uk\/tg\/november-1945\/letter-15-11-45\/\"><span class=\"more-msg\">Continue reading &rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"parent":2963,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3772","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trevorgreenwood.co.uk\/tg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3772","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trevorgreenwood.co.uk\/tg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trevorgreenwood.co.uk\/tg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trevorgreenwood.co.uk\/tg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trevorgreenwood.co.uk\/tg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3772"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/trevorgreenwood.co.uk\/tg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3772\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3849,"href":"https:\/\/trevorgreenwood.co.uk\/tg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3772\/revisions\/3849"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trevorgreenwood.co.uk\/tg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2963"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trevorgreenwood.co.uk\/tg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3772"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}